Understanding File Systems: NTFS, FAT32, exFAT, APFS, HFS+, Ext4 Explained & What Format Should You Use?
By TheSweetBits
Imagine your hard drive or SSD as a massive library. Without a librarian or a cataloging system, finding a specific book would be impossible. In the world of computers, that librarian and cataloging system is the file system. It’s the method an operating system uses to organize, store, and retrieve files on a disk. Without it, your data would be a chaotic jumble of bits and bytes.
Understanding file systems is crucial because the format of your drive dictates:
Compatibility: Which operating systems and devices can read from and write to it.
Performance: How quickly data can be accessed and saved.
Features: Support for large files, security permissions, data recovery, and more.
Data Integrity: How well your data is protected against corruption in case of power loss or system crashes.
This guide will explain the most common file systems—NTFS, FAT32, exFAT, APFS, HFS+, and Ext4—understanding their features, advantages, and disadvantages. Most importantly, we’ll help you choose the right format for your specific needs, whether it’s for your computer’s internal drive, an external backup, or a cross-platform flash drive.
Part 1. File System Formats At a Glance
File System
Developer
Primary OS
Max File Size
Max Volume Size
Native Cross-Platform Support
Best Use Case
NTFS
Microsoft
Windows
16 TB to 8 PB
Up to 8 PB
Read-only on macOS by default (write requires third-party), Linux partial support
Windows system drives, external drives used mainly on Windows
FAT32
Microsoft
Universal
4 GB
2 TB (practical limit)
Yes (all major OS, devices)
Small USB drives, legacy cross-platform compatibility
exFAT
Microsoft
Universal
16 EB
128 PB
Yes (modern Windows, macOS 10.6.5+, Linux kernel 5.4+)
USB flash drives, SD cards, external drives for multi-OS use
APFS
Apple
macOS/iOS
8 EB
8 EB
No (limited support outside Apple devices)
macOS internal SSDs, modern Apple devices
HFS+
Apple
macOS
8 EB
8 EB
No (third-party required on Windows)
Older Macs, external drives for legacy macOS support
Ext4
Linux
Linux
16 TB
1 EB
No (third-party tools required for Windows/macOS)
Linux systems, Linux data drives
Part 2: Understanding the Major File Systems
Let’s break down the key characteristics of each prominent file system.
1. NTFS (new technology file system)
Who Developed It: Microsoft
Primary OS: Windows (default for all modern Windows versions)
Key Features & Advantages:
Journaling: A crucial feature that logs changes before they are committed to the disk. This dramatically improves data integrity and allows for faster recovery in case of system crashes or power outages.
Security: Supports Access Control Lists (ACLs) for file and folder permissions, allowing granular control over who can access what.
Large File & Volume Support: Practically no realistic limits for file or partition sizes for typical users (supports files up to 16TB to 8PB and volumes up to 8PB).
Advanced Features: Includes built-in file compression, encryption (Encrypting File System – EFS), disk quotas, and shadow copies (for previous versions of files).
TRIM Support: Essential for maintaining performance and extending the lifespan of SSDs.
Disadvantages:
Limited Cross-Platform Compatibility: While Windows is its home, macOS can typically read NTFS drives but cannot write to them natively without third-party software. Linux generally has read/write support, but it might require additional drivers or configuration.
Overhead: More complex than FAT32 or exFAT, leading to slightly higher resource usage.
Primary OS: Universal (supported by virtually all operating systems and devices)
Key Features & Advantages:
Maximum Compatibility: The most widely compatible file system. It can be read and written by Windows, macOS, Linux, game consoles (like older PlayStations), smart TVs, digital cameras, and many other devices.
Simple & Lightweight: Minimal overhead, making it efficient for small, portable storage.
Disadvantages:
Severe File Size Limit: Cannot store individual files larger than 4GB. This is its most significant limitation, especially for modern media like 4K videos or large application installers.
Volume Size Limit: Typically limited to a maximum partition size of 2TB (though technically up to 8TB in some implementations, 2TB is the practical Windows limit for formatting).
No Journaling: Highly susceptible to data corruption if the drive is not safely ejected or if there’s a power failure during a write operation.
No Security Features: Lacks file permissions or encryption.
No TRIM Support.
3. exFAT (extended file allocation table)
Who Developed It: Microsoft
Primary OS: Designed for flash memory, offering improved cross-platform compatibility beyond FAT32.
Key Features & Advantages:
Overcomes FAT32 Limits: No practical file size or partition size limits, allowing you to store large media files.
Excellent Cross-Platform Compatibility: Widely supported by modern versions of Windows, macOS (since 10.6.5), and Linux (native support since Kernel 5.7). Also used by many digital cameras, drones, and modern gaming consoles (PS4/PS5, Xbox One/Series X/S).
Optimized for Flash Drives: Lightweight, making it efficient for USB drives and SD cards.
Disadvantages:
No Journaling: Like FAT32, it lacks journaling, making it vulnerable to data corruption if the drive is not safely ejected or if there’s a power interruption during writes. This is a critical point for reliability.
No Security Features: No native file permissions or encryption.
Not Ideal for System Drives: Due to the lack of journaling, it’s not recommended for drives that host an operating system or critical frequently-written data.
4. APFS (Apple file system)
Who Developed It: Apple
Primary OS: macOS (default since High Sierra 10.13), iOS, iPadOS, tvOS, watchOS.
Key Features & Advantages:
Optimized for SSDs: Designed from the ground up for the speed and architecture of Solid State Drives and flash storage, though it works with traditional HDDs too.
Copy-on-Write (CoW): Enables instant file and directory duplication without consuming additional storage until changes are made. This also contributes to robust data integrity.
Space Sharing: Multiple volumes within a single APFS container can share the same free space, making disk management more flexible.
Snapshots: Allows you to create read-only copies of the file system at a specific point in time, useful for backups and system restoration.
Strong Encryption: Built-in full-disk encryption with multi-key encryption for enhanced security.
Checksums: Verifies the integrity of metadata and, optionally, user data to prevent corruption.
Disadvantages:
Limited Compatibility: Primarily an Apple-exclusive file system. Windows cannot natively read or write to APFS drives. Linux support is developing but not fully mature or native.
Not Backward Compatible with Older macOS: Drives formatted with APFS cannot be read by macOS versions older than High Sierra (10.13).
Potential for Complexity: Features like “containers” and “volumes” can be confusing for new users.
5. HFS+ (hierarchical file system plus / Mac OS extended)
Who Developed It: Apple
Primary OS: macOS (default for versions prior to High Sierra 10.13)
Key Features & Advantages:
Journaling: Offers good data integrity, similar to NTFS, providing protection against data loss due to unexpected shutdowns.
Native Apple Support: Fully supported for read and write operations on all macOS versions.
Widely Used for Time Machine: Common for Time Machine backups on some older macOS versions.
Disadvantages:
Legacy System: Superseded by APFS for modern Macs and SSDs.
Limited Cross-Platform Compatibility: Windows cannot natively read or write to HFS+ drives without third-party software. Linux support exists but may require specific tools.
Less Optimized for SSDs: While it works on SSDs, it doesn’t have the same flash-optimized features as APFS.
6. Ext4 (fourth extended file system)
Who Developed It: Linux developers
Primary OS: Linux (default for most modern Linux distributions)
Key Features & Advantages:
Journaling: Robust data integrity, similar to NTFS and HFS+, protecting against data loss.
Large File & Volume Support: Supports very large files and volumes.
Reliable & Mature: A highly stable and feature-rich file system, widely used in server environments.
Backward Compatible: Can typically read from older Ext2 and Ext3 file systems.
Disadvantages:
Poor Cross-Platform Compatibility: Windows and macOS cannot natively read or write to Ext4 drives. Third-party drivers are required for access, which can be unstable or slow.
Not Ideal for Flash Storage: While it works, it’s not specifically optimized for flash memory like exFAT or APFS.
Part 3: Which File System Should I Use
Now that you understand the characteristics of each, let’s look at common scenarios to help you decide.
1. For your computer’s internal system drive
This is where your operating system (Windows, macOS, Linux) resides and typically requires the most robust and native file system for performance and stability.
Windows PC (Desktop/Laptop): NTFS. This is the default and the best choice. It offers excellent performance, security, and data integrity features for a Windows environment.
Mac (MacBook, iMac, Mac Studio): APFS. This is the default for macOS High Sierra (10.13) and newer, especially for SSDs. If you have an older Mac with an HDD or are running an older macOS, HFS+ (Mac OS Extended Journaled) might still be the default or a suitable option.
Linux PC: Ext4. This is the standard and most reliable choice for most Linux distributions.
2. For external hard drives (HDDs/SSDs)
The choice here heavily depends on which operating systems you need to access the drive from.
External Drive for Mac Only:
APFS: If you’re on macOS High Sierra or newer and prioritize modern features like snapshots and efficient SSD use, especially for an external SSD.
HFS+ (Mac OS Extended Journaled): A solid choice for external HDDs, especially if you also use older macOS versions or require compatibility for Time Machine backups on pre-Big Sur systems.
External Drive for Windows Only:
NTFS: Best for performance, reliability, and security within a Windows ecosystem. No file size limits to worry about.
External Drive for Mac and Windows (Cross-Platform):
exFAT: This is generally the best choice for modern cross-platform compatibility. Both Windows and recent macOS versions can read and write to it natively, and it supports large files. Remember the lack of journaling and safely eject the drive.
FAT32: Only if you need compatibility with very old devices (e.g., legacy game consoles, ancient media players) and are absolutely certain that no single file will exceed 4GB. Otherwise, exFAT is superior.
External Drive for Mac, Windows, and Linux:
exFAT: Still the most practical choice for broad read/write compatibility across all three major OS, keeping in mind the journaling limitation.
NTFS (with third-party software): Possible, but requires installing drivers on macOS and potentially Linux, which can introduce instability or cost.
Ext4 (with third-party software): Possible, but similarly requires drivers on Windows/macOS.
These are typically used for sharing files between devices, making compatibility the prime concern.
Most Common & Recommended: exFAT. It offers the best balance of compatibility across modern Windows, macOS, and many other devices (cameras, TVs, consoles) while supporting large files.
For Older/Limited Devices or Small Files: FAT32. If exFAT causes issues with a specific older device, FAT32 is the fallback, but be mindful of the 4GB file size limit.
4. For Time Machine backups on Mac
macOS Big Sur (11.0) and newer: Time Machine uses APFS for backups by default.
macOS Catalina (10.15) and older: Time Machine uses HFS+ (Mac OS Extended Journaled) by default.
Part 3: Important Considerations & Tips
Always Back Up Before Formatting: Reformatting a drive will erase all data on it. Always transfer important files to another location before changing a drive’s file system.
Journaling is Critical for Integrity: File systems with journaling (NTFS, APFS, HFS+, Ext4) are more resilient to data corruption from unexpected shutdowns or power loss. If you use exFAT or FAT32, always “Safely Remove Hardware” or “Eject” the drive before disconnecting it.
File Size Limits Matter: If you plan to store large files (e.g., movies, disk images, large datasets), avoid FAT32.
Native is Best for Performance: For your operating system’s primary drive, stick to its native file system (NTFS for Windows, APFS/HFS+ for Mac, Ext4 for Linux) for optimal performance and stability.
Third-Party Drivers Come with Caveats: While software exists to enable read/write access to non-native file systems (e.g., NTFS on Mac, Ext4 on Windows), they can sometimes be less stable or slower than native support. Use them with caution for critical data.
Future-Proofing: For new external drives, exFAT is generally a safer bet for future compatibility than FAT32, unless you have a specific, very old device requirement.
Conclusion
There’s no single “best” file system that fits every scenario. The ideal choice depends entirely on how you plan to use the drive, which operating systems need to access it, and what your priorities are regarding file size, security, and data integrity.
By understanding the unique strengths and weaknesses of NTFS, FAT32, exFAT, APFS, HFS+, and Ext4, you can make an informed decision that ensures your data is stored efficiently, securely, and is accessible whenever and wherever you need it. Embrace this knowledge, and you’ll be well on your way to becoming a true master of your digital storage!